From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dron v. Beitscher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted January 19, 2000

February 28, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated February 5, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Frank V. Merlino, Garden City, N.Y. (David Holmes of counsel), for appellant.

Seidmann Mermelstein, Brooklyn, N.Y. (David J. Seidmann of counsel), for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There is an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see,Belmonte v. Collins, 261 A.D.2d 496 ; Mariaca-Olmos v. Mizrhy, 226 A.D.2d 437 ).


Summaries of

Dron v. Beitscher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Dron v. Beitscher

Case Details

Full title:EDUARD DRON, respondent, v. EMANUEL BEITSCHER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 752