From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drogosch v. Metcalf

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 10, 2008
Case No. 05-60071 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 10, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 05-60071.

April 10, 2008


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL


This matter came before the court on defendant Tim Metcalf's February 20, 2008 motion to stay pending appeal. Plaintiff filed a response March 7, 2008; and Metcalf filed a reply March 14, 2008. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), no oral argument was heard.

On August 22, 2007, the court denied defendant Metcalf's summary judgment motion based on qualified immunity and later denied Metcalf's motion for reconsideration. Defendant Metcalf filed timely notice of appeal February 20, 2008.

The United States Court of Appeals has found that once an appeal is filed based on qualified immunity, it is appropriate for the district court to stay the proceedings pending the appeal. English v. Dyke, 23 F.3d 1086, 1089 (6th Cir. 1994).

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant Metcalf's February 20, 2008 motion for stay pending appeal is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Drogosch v. Metcalf

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 10, 2008
Case No. 05-60071 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Drogosch v. Metcalf

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD J. DROGOSCH, Plaintiff, v. TIM METCALF, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 10, 2008

Citations

Case No. 05-60071 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 10, 2008)