From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Droge v. National Tower Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 29, 1939
171 Misc. 675 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)

Opinion

June 29, 1939.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Samuel Akelmacher, for the appellant.

Allan D. Emil [ Joel J. Weiner of counsel], for the respondent.



By adding the words "for a limited time" to his signature plaintiff must be deemed to have made a counter offer to the defendant. Such counter offer required the defendant's acceptance, either express or implied, in order to become a binding contract. There was no express acceptance nor have any facts been set forth from which an acceptance may be implied. It was, accordingly, error to deny the motion for summary judgment.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted for the relief demanded in the complaint as amended by a stipulation dated April 3, 1939, with costs.

FRANKENTHALER and NOONAN, JJ., concur; McCOOK, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Droge v. National Tower Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 29, 1939
171 Misc. 675 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
Case details for

Droge v. National Tower Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK W. DROGE, Appellant, v. NATIONAL TOWER CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1939

Citations

171 Misc. 675 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
13 N.Y.S.2d 569