From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Droege v. Security and Inv. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 15, 1985
468 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-413.

May 15, 1985.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

John Avery, Jupiter, and Edna L. Caruso of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Stanley Hyman of Stierer, Amendola, Kaplan Hyman, West Palm Beach, for appellee — Security and Inv. Corp. of the Palm Beaches.


We find that neither Peoples Mortgage Company nor Security and Investment Corporation of the Palm Beaches were holders in due course; and that appellants' defenses should have been tried or pled, together with any reply thereto by appellee, Security. We reverse and remand with direction to retry the case, considering appellants' defenses and appellee's reply thereto. The trial court may consider amendments to pleadings by either party upon remand, should either desire to have same considered.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Droege v. Security and Inv. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 15, 1985
468 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Droege v. Security and Inv. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD JAMES DROEGE AND CALENE DROEGE, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. SECURITY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 15, 1985

Citations

468 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Security Inv. Corp. v. Droege

In a prior appeal to this court, we held that the Droeges were entitled to assert any defenses to the note…