From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drivetime v. Orlando Auto SPLST

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 2009
22 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5D08-315.

October 30, 2009. Rehearing Denied December 3, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Frederick J. Lauten, Judge.

Robert E. Sickles, P.A., and Charles G. Geitner, P.A., of Broad and Cassel, Tampa, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nicholas A. Shannin, of Page, Eichenblatt, Bernbaum Bennett, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.


We find no error in the trial court's decision to submit the civil theft claim to the jury. We also conclude that Appellee offered sufficient proof of the damages suffered as the result of the theft. The cross-appeal is accordingly moot. The final judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Drivetime v. Orlando Auto SPLST

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 2009
22 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Drivetime v. Orlando Auto SPLST

Case Details

Full title:DRIVETIME CAR SALES, INC. d/b/a Drivetime, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 3, 2009

Citations

22 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)