From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driver v. Sirken

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 7, 2024
24-cv-02897-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-02897-JD

08-07-2024

BILLY DRIVER, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR SIRKEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RE: DKT. NO. 10

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint. Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this case should not be deemed three strikes barred and the application to proceed in forma pauperis denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff filed a notice (Dkt. No. 14) seeking to dismiss this case without prejudice because he is pursuing settlement in another pending case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) this case is dismissed without prejudice and the clerk is requested to close the case. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 10) is denied as moot. If plaintiff seeks to reopen this case, he must also respond to the Court's order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Driver v. Sirken

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 7, 2024
24-cv-02897-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Driver v. Sirken

Case Details

Full title:BILLY DRIVER, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR SIRKEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 7, 2024

Citations

24-cv-02897-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2024)