From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driver v. Kern County Superior Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 25, 2021
2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P

06-25-2021

BILLY DRIVER, JR.,, Plaintiff, v. KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for return of his books and legal documents. (ECF No. 33.) The undersigned construes plaintiff's motion as a motion for a protective order. See Wilson v. Nesbeth, 2011 WL 4043569, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2011) (magistrate judges are authorized to issue orders for non-dispositive orders or motions not involving injunctive relief).

For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff's motion for return of his books and legal documents is denied.

In the pending motion, plaintiff requests that his legal property, law books, dictionary and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) approved tablet be returned to him. On May 24, 2021, the undersigned directed defense counsel to contact the litigation coordinator at the California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”), where plaintiff is housed, and to inform the court of what access, if any, plaintiff presently has to his legal property related to this case. (ECF No. 37.)

On June 15, 2021, defense counsel filed a response to the May 24, 2021 order. (ECF No. 52.) Attached to the response is the declaration of Correctional Officer S. Beruman, who works as a property officer and distributes property to inmates on B yard. (ECF No. 52-1.) Officer Beruman states, in relevant part,

3. On May 24, 2021, I provided inmate Billy Driver (D-35391) with legal property. Mr. Driver was housed at a Psychiatric Inpatient Program at that time. Based on existing policies, before I could provide him with legal property, I needed to get approval from his treatment team regarding what property was allowed. Mr. Driver's treatment team provided that approval for much of his property, including legal material, on or about May 17, 2021.
4. A true and correct copy of a property inventory form for inmate Driver, showing he received legal material on May 24, 2021, is attached as Exhibit A to this declaration. Inmate Driver signed that form to acknowledge receipt of four boxes of property.
5. Mr. Driver had an electronic tablet when he came to this facility, but he was not allowed to keep that tablet because it is a JPay tablet, and to my knowledge, that type of tablet is only allowed at certain CDCR facilities where a pilot program regarding tablets is currently being instituted. California Health Care Facility is not part of that program. The tablet is currently being stored for Mr. Driver within the institution.
(Id. at 2.)

The declaration of S. Beruman shows that plaintiff received all of his legal property except for his tablet. Plaintiff does not require his tablet in order to prosecute this action. Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for return of his books and legal documents is denied because plaintiff received the legal property he requires to prosecute this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for return of his books and legal documents (ECF No. 33) is denied.


Summaries of

Driver v. Kern County Superior Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 25, 2021
2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Driver v. Kern County Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:BILLY DRIVER, JR.,, Plaintiff, v. KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 25, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)