From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driver v. Kern Cnty. Superior Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 29, 2021
2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P

12-29-2021

BILLY DRIVER, JR., Plaintiff, v. KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motions for sanctions. (ECF No. 104.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff's motion for sanctions is denied.

In the pending motion, plaintiff contends that defendants failed to comply with the November 18, 2021 order directing them to file a supplemental opposition to plaintiff's motions to be taken off anti-psychotic medication within twenty-one days of the date of the order. However, on December 8, 2021, defendants filed a timely supplemental opposition in compliance with the November 18, 2021 order. (ECF No. 100.)

Plaintiff signed his motion for sanctions on December 8, 2021. Therefore, it is likely plaintiff had not received defendants' supplemental opposition at the time he signed his motion for sanctions.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for sanctions (ECF No. 104) is denied.


Summaries of

Driver v. Kern Cnty. Superior Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 29, 2021
2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Driver v. Kern Cnty. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:BILLY DRIVER, JR., Plaintiff, v. KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)