From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driver v. Kelso

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 25, 2013
514 F. App'x 662 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-17228 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-02397-EFB

03-25-2013

BILLY DRIVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. CLARK KELSO; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Driver consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).


Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Billy Driver appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force, access- to-courts, and deliberate indifference claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the dismissal of an action for failure to comply with an order to file an amended complaint, Ferdick v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Driver's action with prejudice after Driver failed to comply with the court's order to file an amended complaint despite getting an explanation of the deficiencies in each claim and instructions on how to amend. See id. at 1260-61 (setting forth factors to consider in dismissing an action for failure to comply with order to amend).

Driver's contention that the magistrate judge was biased against Driver and should have recused himself is unpersuasive. See 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) (requiring disqualification only when a judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned); Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994) (judicial rulings are not a valid basis for disqualification); Pau v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co., 928 F.2d 880, 885 (9th Cir. 1991) (failure to move for recusal increases party's burden on appeal to demonstrate that the trial judge erred in not recusing himself).

Driver's motion to preemptively disqualify Magistrate Judge Brennan from presiding over any future cases filed by Driver is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Driver v. Kelso

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 25, 2013
514 F. App'x 662 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Driver v. Kelso

Case Details

Full title:BILLY DRIVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. CLARK KELSO; et al., Defendants…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

514 F. App'x 662 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Driver v. The IRS of Fresno

Driver v. Kelso, 2012 WL 3277080 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2012), aff'd, 514 Fed.Appx. 662 (9th Cir. …

Driver v. Sirken

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal. Driver v. Kelso, 514 Fed.Appx. 662 (9th Cir. 2013)…