From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DRIVER v. CARDIOVASCULAR CLINICAL ASS

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 30, 2010
488 Mich. 957 (Mich. 2010)

Opinion

No. 140922.

November 30, 2010.

Reported below. 287 Mich App 339.

TX Order Granting Oral Argument in Case Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal Entered. At oral argument, the parties shall address whether this Court's decision in Bush v Shabahang, 484 Mich 156 (2009), allows for the application of MCL 600.2301 in cases involving prematurely filed complaints under MCL 600.2912b(1) and whether Burton v Reed City Hosp Corp, 471 Mich 745 (2005), retains any viability in light of Bush. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Michigan Association for Justice, Michigan State Medical Society, Michigan Health and Hospital Association, and Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

DRIVER v. CARDIOVASCULAR CLINICAL ASS

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 30, 2010
488 Mich. 957 (Mich. 2010)
Case details for

DRIVER v. CARDIOVASCULAR CLINICAL ASS

Case Details

Full title:DRIVER v. CARDIOVASCULAR CLINICAL ASSOCIATES

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

488 Mich. 957 (Mich. 2010)