From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driskell v. General Motors Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 31, 2006
Civil Case No. 04-40224 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 04-40224.

March 31, 2006


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff filed the instant hybrid action alleging breach of contract on the part of his employer, Defendant General Motors Corp. ("GM"), and a breach of the duty of fair representation on the part of his union, Defendant UAW. The Court granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment on December 20, 2005. Before the Court is Defendant GM's motion for Rule 11 sanctions seeking attorney fees and costs expended to defend the suit, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's motion be granted, and that the Court enter an Order requiring both Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel to each pay GM the sum of $9,426.12.

Having conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, Defendant's motion, and the applicable portions of the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [docket entry 34] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court, and Defendant GM's motion for Rule 11 sanctions [docket entry 21] is GRANTED. Both Plaintiff Driskell and Plaintiff's counsel are each required to pay Defendant GM the sum of $9,426.12.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Driskell v. General Motors Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 31, 2006
Civil Case No. 04-40224 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2006)
Case details for

Driskell v. General Motors Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LANCE CHARLTON DRISKELL, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2006

Citations

Civil Case No. 04-40224 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2006)