From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driskel v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1140 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1140 FCD KJM P.

August 28, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 21, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 21, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Driskel v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1140 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Driskel v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW DRISKEL, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1140 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)