From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driscoll v. Dennis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT COLORADO
Aug 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00608-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00608-RPM

08-04-2011

ROSEMARY DRISCOLL, Plaintiff, v. ERIC A.M. DENNIS, CLARK C. GRIFFITH and LAW OFFICE OF CLARK C. GRIFFITH, A Minnesota Professional Association, Defendants.


ORDER PERMITTING CLARK C. GRIFFITH TO PARTICIPATE IN TRIAL AS

WITNESS AND COUNSEL

In this civil action in which Clark C. Griffith is a defendant and has been counsel for defendant Eric A.M. Dennis and because Mr. Griffith is also expected to testify as a witness, a dual role which is normally inappropriate, but because Mr. Griffith has been apparently unable to obtain counsel and because of the age of this case any further delay in proceeding with the trial scheduled to begin on Monday, August 8, 2011, would be prejudicial and because this is a trial to the Court, it is now

ORDERED that Clark C. Griffith will be permitted to participate at trial both as counsel for the defendants and as a witness.

BY THE COURT:

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Driscoll v. Dennis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT COLORADO
Aug 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00608-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Driscoll v. Dennis

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARY DRISCOLL, Plaintiff, v. ERIC A.M. DENNIS, CLARK C. GRIFFITH and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT COLORADO

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00608-RPM (D. Colo. Aug. 4, 2011)