From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driscoll v. Delarosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2008
57 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4829.

December 16, 2008.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura E. Drager, J.), entered on or about May 14, 2008, which declined to sign an order to show cause, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Michael Driscoll, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York (Diana R.H. Winters of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.


An order declining to sign an order to show cause is not appealable (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Heath v Wojtowicz, 48 AD3d 214, lv denied 10 NY3d 708). We would add that to the extent plaintiff seeks damages against the State, Supreme Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction (Court of Claims Act §§ 8, 9; Pollicina v Misericordia Hasp. Med. Ctr., 82 NY2d 332, 339 n 3 [1993]).


Summaries of

Driscoll v. Delarosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2008
57 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Driscoll v. Delarosa

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DRISCOLL, Appellant, v. NEYDA DELAROSA, Defendant, and NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
868 N.Y.S.2d 529

Citing Cases

Nemni v. Poole

Compensatory and Punitive Damages To the extent that petitioners seek monetary damages against the State…

McFadden v. Schneiderman

Since the OAG defendants' conduct for which plaintiff seeks damages was in their official capacity,…