From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driemeyer v. Leahy

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,<strong><em>DIVISION FOUR</em></strong>.
Oct 6, 2015
471 S.W.3d 402 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102227

10-06-2015

Sheila A. Driemeyer, Respondent, v. James Leahy, Appellant.

Jonathan D. Marks, Four City Place Dr., Suite 497, St. Louis, MO 63141, for appellant. Vita G. Tocco, 121 Chesterfield Business Parkway, Chesterfield, MO 63005, for respondent.


Jonathan D. Marks, Four City Place Dr., Suite 497, St. Louis, MO 63141, for appellant.

Vita G. Tocco, 121 Chesterfield Business Parkway, Chesterfield, MO 63005, for respondent.

ORDER

James Leahy (“Husband”) appeals a judgment for contempt arising out of an alleged breach of a settlement agreement incorporated into a judgment dissolving his marriage to Sheila A. Driemeyer (“Wife”).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Driemeyer v. Leahy

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,<strong><em>DIVISION FOUR</em></strong>.
Oct 6, 2015
471 S.W.3d 402 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

Driemeyer v. Leahy

Case Details

Full title:Sheila A. Driemeyer, Respondent, v. James Leahy, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

471 S.W.3d 402 (E.D. Mo. 2015)