From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dreyfus v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-1557-RS (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-1557-RS

05-07-2013

LAUREN DREYFUS and RAYMOND DREYFUS, Plaintiff(s), v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. d/b/a STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, Defendant(s).


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY

PROCEEDINGS PENDING RULING

BY MDL PANEL

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

After consideration of Plaintiffs Lauren Dreyfus and Raymond Dreyfus and Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp (sued as Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics)'s Joint Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Ruling by MDL Panel, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the Joint Stipulation is GRANTED. All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed and all current deadlines are vacated pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's decision on the pending transfer request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

The Honorable Richard Seeborg


Summaries of

Dreyfus v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-1557-RS (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Dreyfus v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LAUREN DREYFUS and RAYMOND DREYFUS, Plaintiff(s), v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 7, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-1557-RS (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)