Opinion
No. 32874
Decided January 16, 1952.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Wills — Oral contract to make, in consideration of services, unenforceable — Section 10504-3a, General Code — Services rendered not part performance, when — Revoked will in party's favor containing no reference to contract — Not construed as memorandum of contract, when — Constructive trusts claimed — Retroactive laws — Section 28, Article II, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.
Messrs. Jansen, Englender Jansen and Mr. George J. Weller, for appellant.
Mr. Chas. K. Pulse and Mr. Paul D. Naylor, for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.