From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drew v. Merchan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 9, 2020
185 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

11792 M–1647 Ind. 2510/18

07-09-2020

In re Keith DREW, Petitioner, v. Hon. Juan MERCHAN, Respondent.

Keith Drew, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.


Keith Drew, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

Acosta, P.J., Manzanet–Daniels, Kapnick, Singh, Gonza´lez, JJ.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules for a writ of mandamus to vacate an order, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan Merchan, J.), entered on or about August 19, 2019 terminating petitioner's participation in a judicial diversion program, and reinstating his plea agreement,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.


Summaries of

Drew v. Merchan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 9, 2020
185 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Drew v. Merchan

Case Details

Full title:In re Keith Drew, Petitioner, v. Hon. Juan Merchan, Respondent.

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 9, 2020

Citations

185 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 3858
124 N.Y.S.3d 800