From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drevaleva v. McDonough

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
22-cv-00887-JST (N.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-00887-JST

06-15-2022

TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, Plaintiff, v. DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY RE: ECF NO. 41

JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

The Court grants Plaintiff Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva's motion to extend the deadline to file her reply from June 13, 2022 to June 20, 2022. ECF No. 41.

Plaintiff's request to file a reply brief of longer than 15 pages is denied.

Plaintiff states that she “cited numerous statutes in [her] Reply that [she] hadn't cited in [her] First Motion to Strike.” Id. at 3. Plaintiff is reminded that the Court does not ordinarily consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief. See Cardone v. Cnty. of Alameda, No. 19-cv-00221-JST, 2019 WL 7816822, at *3 n.4 (N.D. Cal. July 30, 2019).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Drevaleva v. McDonough

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
22-cv-00887-JST (N.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Drevaleva v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, Plaintiff, v. DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

22-cv-00887-JST (N.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)