From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dream v. Persson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 23, 2015
Case No. 6:13 CV 01936-SU (D. Or. Jan. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 6:13 CV 01936-SU

01-23-2015

JEWELLS DREAM, Petitioner, v. ROB PERSSON, Respondent.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Sullivan filed her Findings and Recommendation on December 12, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 23 day of January, 2015.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dream v. Persson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 23, 2015
Case No. 6:13 CV 01936-SU (D. Or. Jan. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Dream v. Persson

Case Details

Full title:JEWELLS DREAM, Petitioner, v. ROB PERSSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 23, 2015

Citations

Case No. 6:13 CV 01936-SU (D. Or. Jan. 23, 2015)