From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drazek v. Vital Transp., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2016
135 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

01-27-2016

Lesley DRAZEK, appellant, v. VITAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., respondent.

Lesley Drazek, Ridgewood, N.Y., appellant pro se. Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan Mazer of counsel), for respondent.


Lesley Drazek, Ridgewood, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan Mazer of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated March 2, 2015, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) (1) to vacate a prior order of the same court dated October 2, 2014, inter alia, granting the defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint and to confirm a prior arbitration award upon the plaintiff's default.

ORDERED that the order dated March 2, 2015, is affirmed, with costs.

In an order dated October 2, 2014, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted the defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint and to confirm a prior arbitration award. The Supreme Court noted that the plaintiff had "defaulted by not appearing at either the first or second call of the calendar" on October 2, 2014.

By order to show cause dated December 2, 2014, the plaintiff moved pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate the order dated October 2, 2014. In an order dated March 2, 2015, the Supreme Court denied that motion. The Supreme Court noted that, while the plaintiff might have had a reasonable excuse for his default in appearing at the calendar call, he failed to make the appropriate showing of merit. The plaintiff appeals from the order dated March 2, 2015. The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1), as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a potentially meritorious opposition to the defendant's cross motion (see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Rooney, 132 A.D.3d 980, 19 N.Y.S.3d 543 ; see also Estrada v. Selman, 130 A.D.3d 562, 12 N.Y.S.3d 290 ; Thapt v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 89 A.D.3d 837, 932 N.Y.S.2d 346 ).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., DICKERSON, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Drazek v. Vital Transp., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2016
135 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Drazek v. Vital Transp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Lesley DRAZEK, appellant, v. VITAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

135 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
23 N.Y.S.3d 586