From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Draughn v. Embers Imperial House

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 15, 1967
196 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 35960.

March 15, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

William M. Holt of the Law Offices of John A. Chilldon, Tampa, for petitioner-cross-respondent.

Charles A. Zinn, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, for respondents-cross-petitioners.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.


By petition for a writ of certiorari and cross-petition we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The cross-petition is denied.

The Petitioner's petition for attorney's fees is also denied. The petition filed by Petitioner for defending against the cross-petition is granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Draughn v. Embers Imperial House

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 15, 1967
196 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Draughn v. Embers Imperial House

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS WOODROW DRAUGHN, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. EMBERS IMPERIAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 15, 1967

Citations

196 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1967)