From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 8, 2008
No. CIV S-05-2075 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2075 JAM GGH P.

October 8, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion entitled motion to compel Corcoran State Prison Officials to give plaintiff law library access. In his motion, plaintiff alleges that court orders are necessary before he can use the law library and he therefore requests that the court issue an order granting him "Preferred Legal User" status.

Plaintiff does not allege that he is under a present obligation to submit documents within a time certain and thus has not demonstrated that his right of access to the courts is being impaired. The court will not set a deadline merely for the purpose of insuring the plaintiff additional library time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 25, 2008 motion for a court-ordered deadline (Docket #58) is denied.


Summaries of

Drake v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 8, 2008
No. CIV S-05-2075 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Drake v. White

Case Details

Full title:DEAN CLAY DRAKE, Plaintiff, v. MIKE WHITE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 8, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2075 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2008)