From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 18, 2010
No. CIV S-05-2075 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2075 JAM GGH P.

February 18, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 2, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 2, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket #79) is denied.


Summaries of

Drake v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 18, 2010
No. CIV S-05-2075 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Drake v. White

Case Details

Full title:DEAN DRAKE, Plaintiff, v. MIKE WHITE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2075 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2010)