From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
Aug 11, 2022
No. 06-22-00059-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 11, 2022)

Opinion

06-22-00059-CR

08-11-2022

KIMBERLY SUEANNE DRAKE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Do Not Publish

Submitted: July 26, 2022

On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 29024

Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES VAN CLEEF, JUSTICE

Kimberly Sueanne Drake appealed the imposition of attorney fees and a time payment fee resulting from her conviction of possession of a controlled substance in an amount less than one gram. During the pendency of this appeal, on June 16, 2022, the trial court sua sponte entered a nunc pro tunc judgment adjudicating guilt. The State has provided us with a supplemental record showing that (1) the trial court did not assess attorney fees in the nunc pro tunc judgment and (2) there is no balance due for either the attorney fees or the time payment fee in the amended bill of costs. Consequently, Drake's complaint regarding the erroneous assessment of fees is moot.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's nunc pro tunc judgment adjudicating guilt.


Summaries of

Drake v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
Aug 11, 2022
No. 06-22-00059-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Drake v. State

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY SUEANNE DRAKE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana

Date published: Aug 11, 2022

Citations

No. 06-22-00059-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 11, 2022)