From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Pierce Butler Radiator Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 31, 1951
279 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

October 31, 1951.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ. [See post, p. 844.]


Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the award to the sum of $5,228.89 and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: The judgment should be modified by reducing the award of $11,075.75 made by the Official Referee to the sum of $5,228.89. The evidence clearly establishes that on all sales of boilers made outside of plaintiff's territory for installation therein, plaintiff's commission was limited to 70% of the discount of 20% allowed by defendant to its agents. We feel that the Referee erred in allowing commissions in excess of 70% on such sales. The over-allowance amounts to $802.86. We also reach the conclusion that the Referee erred in allowing plaintiff $4,384 for extra services performed on boiler installations allegedly due to manufacturing defects in said boilers and for allowing $660 for Clayton valve changes. The testimony supporting the claims for such services is admittedly predicated upon a conservative guess. Testimony of such a character fails to justify the allowances made. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action under a contract of hiring.)


Summaries of

Drake v. Pierce Butler Radiator Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 31, 1951
279 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Drake v. Pierce Butler Radiator Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST A. DRAKE, Doing Business as DRAKE HEATING CO., et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)