From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Phillup

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 30, 2024
2:23-cv-10251-JWH (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-10251-JWH (RAO)

12-30-2024

ERICK MICHAEL DRAKE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN PHILLUP, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's September 6, 2024, Report and Recommendation (“Report”). The deadline for filing objections to the Report has passed and no objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are ACCEPTED and ADOPTED

2. The Petition is DENIED.

3. Judgment shall be entered DISMISSING this action with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Drake v. Phillup

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 30, 2024
2:23-cv-10251-JWH (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Drake v. Phillup

Case Details

Full title:ERICK MICHAEL DRAKE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN PHILLUP, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 30, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-10251-JWH (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2024)