From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Muniak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 9, 2015
Civ. No. 13-3868 (RBK) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jul. 9, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 13-3868 (RBK) (KMW)

07-09-2015

KEITH HASSON DRAKE, Plaintiff, v. ROSELLEN G. MUNIAK, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 8, 2015, this Court screened plaintiff's amended complaint. Some claims were dismissed with prejudice while others were dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff was given thirty days in which to file a proposed second amended complaint that corrected the deficiencies of plaintiff's claims that were dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff subsequently received an extension of time until July 6, 2015 in which to file his proposed second amended complaint. Presently pending before the Court is plaintiff's second request for an extension of time to file a proposed second amended complaint. (See Dkt. No. 21.) Good cause being shown, plaintiff's request will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS this 9th day of July, 2015,

ORDERED that plaintiff's second request for an extension of time to file a proposed second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 21.) is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff may file his proposed second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered.

s/Robert B. Kugler

ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Drake v. Muniak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jul 9, 2015
Civ. No. 13-3868 (RBK) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jul. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Drake v. Muniak

Case Details

Full title:KEITH HASSON DRAKE, Plaintiff, v. ROSELLEN G. MUNIAK, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jul 9, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 13-3868 (RBK) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jul. 9, 2015)