From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Muniak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
May 29, 2015
Civ. No. 13-3868 (RBK) (KMW) (D.N.J. May. 29, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 13-3868 (RBK) (KMW)

05-29-2015

KEITH HASSON DRAKE, Plaintiff, v. ROSELLEN G. MUNIAK, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 7, 2015, this Court screened plaintiff's amended complaint. Some claims of the amended complaint were dismissed with prejudice, while others were dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff was given thirty days in which to file a second amended complaint (if he elected to do so) which addresses the deficiencies of the amended complaint as to his claims that were dismissed without prejudice.

On May 26, 2015, plaintiff submitted a letter which requests an additional thirty days in which to submit a proposed second amended complaint. Good cause being shown, plaintiff shall be given an additional thirty days in which to file his second amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS this 29th day of May, 2015,

ORDERED that plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file a proposed second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 19.) is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff shall file his proposed second amended complaint on or before July 6, 2015.

s/Robert B. Kugler

ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Drake v. Muniak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
May 29, 2015
Civ. No. 13-3868 (RBK) (KMW) (D.N.J. May. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Drake v. Muniak

Case Details

Full title:KEITH HASSON DRAKE, Plaintiff, v. ROSELLEN G. MUNIAK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: May 29, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 13-3868 (RBK) (KMW) (D.N.J. May. 29, 2015)