From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Hughes

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 14, 2010
1:10-CV-668-ID WO (M.D. Ala. Oct. 14, 2010)

Opinion

1:10-CV-668-ID WO.

October 14, 2010


ORDER


On September 22, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 6) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Recommendation (Doc. 6) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. The § 1983 claims presented against Defendants Valeska, Atwell, and Davis be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii);
3. Plaintiff's negligence claim be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
4. Plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of his conviction and sentence and/or pending criminal charges be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time; and
5. This case be DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii).

Done this 14th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Drake v. Hughes

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 14, 2010
1:10-CV-668-ID WO (M.D. Ala. Oct. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Drake v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM DRAKE, JR., Plaintiff, v. ANDY HUGHES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 14, 2010

Citations

1:10-CV-668-ID WO (M.D. Ala. Oct. 14, 2010)