From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. HSBC Bank

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jul 3, 2014
NO. 02-13-00340-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00340-CV

07-03-2014

ERIC DRAKE APPELLANT v. HSBC BANK, CHASE BANK, AND CAPITAL ONE BANK APPELLEES


FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-20534-158


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the parties' "Agreed Motion For Partial Dismissal Of Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss appellant's appeal against appellee Capital One Bank only. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), (b), 43.2(f).

This case shall hereafter be styled "Eric Drake v. HSBC Bank and Chase Bank."

The costs incurred by Capital One are taxed against Capital One, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Drake v. HSBC Bank

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jul 3, 2014
NO. 02-13-00340-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Drake v. HSBC Bank

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DRAKE APPELLANT v. HSBC BANK, CHASE BANK, AND CAPITAL ONE BANK…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jul 3, 2014

Citations

NO. 02-13-00340-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2014)