Drainage Comrs. v. Lumber Co.

14 Citing cases

  1. Russell v. Fulton

    9 S.E.2d 369 (N.C. 1940)

    Whatever rights the defendants may have, if any, are not asserted in this action. They suggest on brief that, if so advised, they may yet redeem under C. S., 8038. As to this, the case of Hines v. Williams, 198 N.C. 420, 152 S.E. 39, would seem to be an authority against them. See, also, Drainage Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 193 N.C. 21, 136 S.E. 248. The judgment in the foreclosure proceeding, admittedly regular in all respects, is apparently binding on them as their predecessor in title, the sole owner of the land at the time, was a party to the proceeding. Hill v. Street, 215 N.C. 312, 1 S.E.2d 850.

  2. Townsend v. Drainage Commissioners

    94 S.E. 101 (N.C. 1917)   Cited 3 times

    Affirmed. Cited: Headman v. Comrs., 177 N.C. 265; Price v. Slagle, 189 N.C. 766; Drainage Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 193 N.C. 24.

  3. Gwaltney v. Timber Co.

    20 S.E. 465 (N.C. 1894)   Cited 8 times

    No error. Cited: Comrs. v. Lumber Co., post, 595; Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 116 N.C. 734, 739; Johnson v. R. R., 140 N.C. 579; Warren v. Lumber Co., 154 N.C. 37; Peanut Co. v. R. R., 155 N.C. 156; Wheeler v. Telephone Co., 172 N.C. 11.

  4. State v. Corporation

    111 N.C. 661 (N.C. 1892)   Cited 5 times

    VENIRE DE NOVO. Cited: Gwaltney v. Land Co., ante, 562; S. v. Finlayson, 113 N.C. 631; Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 116 N.C. 733; S. v. Bradley, 132 N.C. 1061; Warren v. Lumber Co., 154 N.C. 37; S. v. Fisher, 162 N.C. 565. (665)

  5. Deans v. R. R

    12 S.E. 77 (N.C. 1890)   Cited 50 times
    In Deans v. R. R., 107 N.C. 686 (696), Avery, J., in speaking to a state of facts similar to those of the instant case, says: "The jury were at liberty to exercise their own common sense and to use the knowledge acquired by their observation and experience in everyday life in solving the question whether the engineer, in the exercise of due diligence, might have discovered, from his elevated position on the engine, the fact that plaintiff's intestate was lying helpless across the rail, and whether putting his passengers in jeopardy.

    New trial. Cited: Browne v. R. R., 108 N.C. 42; Meredith v. R. R., ib., 618; Ward v. R. R., 109 N.C. 360; Clark v. R. R., ib., 442, 444, 445, 451, 453; Hinkle v. R. R., ib., 474; McQuay v. R. R., ib., 588; Emry v. R. R., ib., 596, 611; Emry v. Nav. Co., 111 N.C. 102; Norwood v. R. R., ib., 240; Mason v. R. R., ib., 493; Cawfield v. R. R., ib., 600; S. v. Taylor, ib., 681; High v. R. R., 112 N.C. 388; Mason v. Lumber Co., 114 N.C. 723; Smith v. R. R., ib., 739, 769; Gilmore v. R. R., 115 N.C. 662; Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 116 N.C. 735; Sherrill v. Tel. Co., 117 N.C. 361; Pickett v. R. R., ib., 631; N.C. Chesson v. Lumber Co., 118 N.C. 69; Lloyd v. R. R., ib., 1013; Baker v. R. R., ib., 1020; Tillett v. R. R., ib., 1041; Styles v. R. R., ib., 1089; Pharr v. R. R., 119 N.C. 756; Purnell v. R. R., 122 N.C. 848; Norton v. R. R., ib., 935; Whitley v. R. R., ib., 989; Bradley v. R. R., 126 N.C. 741; Wright v. R. R., 127 N.C. 227; McArver v. R. R., 129 N.C. 384; Lea v. R. R., ib., 463; Davis v. R. R., 136 N.C. 117; Sawyer v. R. R., 145 N.C. 27; Daniel v. R. R., ib., 55; Rollins v. R. R., 146 N.C. 157; Jenkins v. R. R., ib., 181; Whitfield v. R. R., 147 N.C. 240; S. v. R. R., 149 N.C. 478; Snipes v. Mfg. Co., 152 N.C. 45, 47; Haire v. R. R., ib., 764; Edge v. R. R., 153 N.C. 215; Cabe v. R. R., 155 N.C. 411; Hanford v. R. R., 167 N.C. 278; Norman v. R. R., ib., 41; Hill v. R. R., 169 N.C. 741; Davis v. R. R., 170 N.C. 586; Horne v. R. R., ib., 652; Brown v. R. R., 172 N.C. 607; McManus v. R. R., 174 N.C. 737; Borden v. R.

  6. Bond v. Wool

    107 N.C. 139 (N.C. 1890)   Cited 26 times
    In Bond v. Wool, 107 N.C. 139, 12 S.E. 281, involving a controversy between two riparian owners, neither had a grant for any of the property extending between the shore line and the channel, and each relied upon his rights as riparian owner.

    Affirmed. Cited: Wool v. Saunders, 108 N.C. 743, 745; Knight v. R. R., 111 N.C. 83; Hopkins v. Bowers, ib., 178; Gwaltney v. Land Co., ib., 552; Tate v. Greensboro, 114 N.C. 404; S. v. Eason, ib., 791; Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 116 N.C. 732; Whitley v. R. R., 122 N.C. 989; Holly v. Smith, 130 N.C. 86; Land Co. v. Hotel, 132 N.C. 530; S. v. Twiford, 136 N.C. 607; Riddick v. Dunn, 145, N.C. 34; Brewer v. Wynne, 154 N.C. 471; R. R. v. Way, 172 N.C. 779. (154)

  7. State v. Narrows Island Club

    100 N.C. 477 (N.C. 1888)   Cited 15 times
    In Narrows Island Club, this Court essentially assumed arguendo that the defendant's title to the land submerged by the water in question was valid.

    No error. Affirmed. Cited: McLaughlin v. Mfg. Co., 103 N.C. 108; S. v. Pool, 106 N.C. 700; Bond v. Wool, 107 N.C. 148; Gwaltney v. Timber Co., 111 N.C. 560, 561; Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 116 N.C. 732; S. v. Baum, 128 N.C. 602; S. v. Twiford, 136 N.C. 607. (484)

  8. Broadnax v. Baker

    94 N.C. 675 (N.C. 1886)   Cited 17 times

    Error. Reversed. Cited: Hodges v. Williams, 95 N.C. 335; S. v. Narrows Island Club, 100 N.C. 481; Bond v. Wool, 107 N.C. 148; Bridge Co. v. Flowers, 110 N.C. 385; Gwaltney v. Timber Co., 111 N.C. 560; S. v. Eason, 114 N.C. 790; Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 116 N.C. 732; S. v. Baum, 128 N.C. 605; S. v. Twiford, 136 N.C. 607; In re Spease Ferry, 138 N.C. 223. (683)

  9. Lumber Co. v. Wallace

    93 N.C. 22 (N.C. 1885)   Cited 29 times
    In Lumber Co. v. Wallace, supra, at p. 30, we find: "It is against the policy of the law to restrain industries and such enterprises as tend to develop the country and its resources. It ought not to be done, except in extreme cases."

    It is ordered. Cited: Frink v. Stewart, 94 N.C. 486; McNair v. Pope, 96 N.C. 506; Durant v. Crowell, 97 N.C. 374; Lewis v. Lumber Co., 99 N.C. 13, 15; Ousby v. Neal, ibid., 148; Stith v. Jones, 101 N.C. 366; Bond v. Wool, 107 N.C. 153; Roberts v. Lewald, ibid., 311; Nav. Co. v. Emry, 108 N.C. 133; Hood v. Sudderth, 111 N.C. 222; Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 114 N.C. 508; Whitehead v. Hall, 118 N.C. 605; McKay v. Chapin, 120 N.C. 160; Sharpe v. Loane, 124 N.C. 2; Tyler v. Capeheart, 125 N.C. 68; Featherstone v. Carr, 132 N.C. 802; Newton v. Brown, 134 N.C. 443; Moore v. Fowle, 139 N.C. 52; Winders v. Hill, 141 N.C. 703; Lumber Co. v. Cedar Co., 142 N.C. 418; Griffin v. R. R., 150 N.C. 315; Taylor v. Riley, 153 N.C. 203; Makuen v. Elder, 170 N.C. 512; Corey v. Hooker, 171 N.C. 235; R. R. v. Thompson, 173 N.C. 262; Stewart v. Munger, 174 N.C. 407; Turner v. Live Stock Co., 179 N.C. 461; Waters v. Garris, 188 N.C. 310; Hurwitz v. Sand Co., 189 N.C. 5; Lumber Co. v. Coppersmith, 191 N.C. 218; Scales v. Trust Co., 195 N.C. 775; Ins. Co. v. Griffin, 200 N.C. 253; Woodall v. Bank, 201 N.C. 432.

  10. University v. Harrison

    93 N.C. 84 (N.C. 1885)   Cited 3 times

    No error. Appeal dismissed. Cited: Fisher v. Mining Co., 97 N.C. 97; Comrs, v. Lumber Co., 116 N.C. 745; Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 69; Weathers v. Borders, 124 N.C. 611.