From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drainage Commissioners v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1927
136 S.E. 722 (N.C. 1927)

Opinion

(Filed 23 February, 1927.)

APPEAL by defendant from Daniels, J., 19 January, 1927, BEAUFORT Superior Court. Affirmed.

Tooly McMullan for plaintiff.

Small, McLean Rodman for defendant.


From an examination of the record we think the statute has been substantially complied with. We see no reason why the legislative ratification is not substantially sufficient. Board of Education v. Comrs., 183 N.C. p. 302; Construction Co. v. Brockenbrough, 187 N.C. p. 77; Storm v. Wrightsville Beach, 189 N.C. at p. 683.

We can find no prejudicial or reversible error. The judgment below is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Drainage Commissioners v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1927
136 S.E. 722 (N.C. 1927)
Case details for

Drainage Commissioners v. Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF DRAINAGE COMMISSIONERS OF PANTEGO RUN DISTRICT, BEAUFORT COUNTY…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1927

Citations

136 S.E. 722 (N.C. 1927)
193 N.C. 830