From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dragutescu v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 2007
38 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-05351.

March 20, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Parker Waichman, LLP, and Michael S. Lamonsoff, the plaintiff's former attorneys, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O'Donoghue, J.), dated March 2, 2006, which, upon the settlement of the action and upon the application by Jonah Grossman, one of the plaintiff's current attorneys, for a division of attorneys' fees, determined, after a hearing, that they had been discharged for cause and, therefore, were not entitled to any part of the attorneys' fees.

Parker Waichman, LLP, and Michael S. Lamonsoff (Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York, N.Y., of counsel), nonparty-appellants pro se.

Dan Mesterman, Jersey City, N.Y., nonparty-respondent pro se.

Before: Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Following the settlement of the plaintiff's personal injury action against the defendant City of New York, a fee dispute arose between the plaintiffs former and current attorneys, and conflicting claims were made as to whether the former attorneys had been discharged with or without cause. The Supreme Court properly held a hearing to resolve the issue ( see Byrne v Leblond, 25 AD3d 640, 642), and determined that the former attorneys had been discharged for cause. Based on the evidence presented at that hearing, we discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court's determination ( see Matter of Stevens, 252 AD2d 654, 655-656).

In light of our determination, we do not address the appellants' remaining contention.


Summaries of

Dragutescu v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 2007
38 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Dragutescu v. Grossman

Case Details

Full title:ECATERINA DRAGUTESCU, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2007

Citations

38 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2506
830 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

Northrop v. State

With regard to Mattar's jurisdictional objection, I find that this Court does indeed have jurisdiction over…

Byrnes v. Ruth

In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, this Court's power is as broad as that of the trial…