From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drabik v. Valle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1959
8 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

May 12, 1959


Order unanimously reversed on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution is granted, with $10 costs. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. No adequate excuse was presented for the delay of more than three years to file a note of issue until the motion was made to dismiss. Moreover, coupled with the inadequate excuse is the failure to submit any affidavit of merits by the plaintiff. Under the circumstances, Special Term should have dismissed the complaint unconditionally.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.


Summaries of

Drabik v. Valle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1959
8 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Drabik v. Valle

Case Details

Full title:FRED DRABIK, Respondent, v. ROBERT VALLE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 12, 1959

Citations

8 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. King Haven Holding Co.

While it may be that under the circumstances of this case there was a showing of a valid excuse for the delay…

Nolan v. Pavlakis

Per Curiam. The misplacing of the file in the office of the plaintiffs' attorney was an inadequate excuse for…