From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DP Value Invs. v. Benites

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2011
Case No. SACV 11-1694 JVS (ANx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. SACV 11-1694 JVS (ANx)

12-06-2011

DP Value Investments v. Benites


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable James V. Selna

Karla J. Tunis

Deputy Clerk

Not Present

Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Not Present

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Action to Superior Court

On November 4, 2011, Jose Benites ("Benites") removed this case from the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange. (Docket No. 1.) He removed this action on the basis of federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331. (Notice of Removal, p.2.)

Although the first page of the Notice states that the underlying action was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, the Superior Court complaint makes clear that the underlying action was filed in Orange County Superior Court. (Notice, Ex. A.)

The Court has reviewed the jurisdictional allegations and has considered other possible bases for jurisdiction in light of the facts pled in the Complaint and the Notice of Removal. The Court finds no basis for jurisdiction and now remands the case.

The Court must determine jurisdiction on the basis of the case removed. The underlying action is an unlawful detainer action. No federal claims are asserted (28 U.S.C. § 1331). Federal defenses or federal counterclaims provide no basis to remove an action which does not otherwise establish federal jurisdiction. See Franchise Tax Board of State of Cal. v Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 643 U.S. 1, 10 (1983); Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v Ford Motor Co., 145 F.3d 320, 326-27 (5th Cir. 1998). There is no basis for federal question jurisdiction.

Neither the Notice of Removal nor the underlying complaint establishes that the parties are diverse, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). In any event, it is apparent that the amount of relief sought is less than the jurisdictional minimum of $75,000. The face of the Complaint states that the amount of claimed damages is less than $10,000. There is no basis for diversity jurisdiction.

The case is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

DP Value Invs. v. Benites

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2011
Case No. SACV 11-1694 JVS (ANx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2011)
Case details for

DP Value Invs. v. Benites

Case Details

Full title:DP Value Investments v. Benites

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. SACV 11-1694 JVS (ANx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2011)