From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dozier v. Vickers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 12, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-0518-MEF (M.D. Ala. Sep. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-0518-MEF

09-12-2012

MARY LOUISE RICHARDSON DOZIER, Plaintiff, v. CHERLENE VICKERS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge has entered a Recommendation (Doc. # 5) that this case be dismissed prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Plaintiff has filed an Objection (Doc. # 6) to the Recommendation. After an independent review of the file in the case, including de novo review of the portions of the Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:

1. Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. # 6) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed on September 4, 2012, is OVERRULED;

2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 5), entered on August 29, 2012, is ADOPTED; and,

3. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

An appropriate final judgment will be entered.

Mark E. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dozier v. Vickers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 12, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-0518-MEF (M.D. Ala. Sep. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Dozier v. Vickers

Case Details

Full title:MARY LOUISE RICHARDSON DOZIER, Plaintiff, v. CHERLENE VICKERS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 12, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-0518-MEF (M.D. Ala. Sep. 12, 2012)