From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dozier v. Modesto Retail Grp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 28, 2022
1:22-cv-01325-ADA-SAB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01325-ADA-SAB

11-28-2022

LEE DOZIER, Plaintiff, v. MODESTO RETAIL GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

(ECF No. 9)

On November 25, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal. (ECF No. 9.) In light of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dozier v. Modesto Retail Grp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 28, 2022
1:22-cv-01325-ADA-SAB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Dozier v. Modesto Retail Grp.

Case Details

Full title:LEE DOZIER, Plaintiff, v. MODESTO RETAIL GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-01325-ADA-SAB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)