From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dozier v. Cartledge

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 2, 2011
441 F. App'x 975 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6397

08-02-2011

JABARI DOZIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LINDA SANDERS; LEROY CARTLEDGE; DENNIS PART; SHARON PATTERSON; ANTHONY PADULA; LAURA MILLER; BRUCE OBERMAN; RONALD CRIBB; GLORIA DAVIS; NORBERTO GORDON; CLINTON MCCONICO; E. MIMS, Defendants - Appellees.

Jabari Dozier, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, G. Murrell Smith, Jr., LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (3:09-cv-02309-JMC)

Before MOTZ, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jabari Dozier, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, G. Murrell Smith, Jr., LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jabari Dozier appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Dozier's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dozier v. Sanders, No. 3:09-cv-02309-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 2011). We grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Dozier v. Cartledge

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 2, 2011
441 F. App'x 975 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Dozier v. Cartledge

Case Details

Full title:JABARI DOZIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LINDA SANDERS; LEROY CARTLEDGE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

441 F. App'x 975 (4th Cir. 2011)