From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 20, 2005
894 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 2005)

Opinion

No. SC03-359.

January 20, 2005.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District — Case No. 2D02-2311 (Manatee County).

Richard R. Garland of Dickinson and Gibbons, P.A., Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner.

Theodore C. Eastmoore of Matthews, Eastmoore, Hardy, Crauwels and Garcia, P.A., Sarasota, FL, for Respondent.


We have for review the decision in Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar, 838 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), which certified conflict with the decision in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Sarkis, 809 So.2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which this Court subsequently approved in Sarkis v. Allstate Insurance Co., 863 So.2d 210 (Fla. 2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)( 4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Sarkis.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 20, 2005
894 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 2005)
Case details for

Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar

Case Details

Full title:Deanna DOYLE-VALLERY, M.D., et al., Petitioners, v. Julie B. ARANIBAR, et…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 20, 2005

Citations

894 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 2005)