From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 20, 2002
807 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-4912

Opinion filed February 20, 2002

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jack H. Cook, Judge; L.T. Case No. 90-16745 CFA02.

Richard W. Springer of Richard W. Springer, P.A., Palm Springs, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the order summarily denying Appellant's motion for post-conviction relief, seeking to vacate his conviction based on the alleged involuntariness of his plea. See Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As we did in Stretcher, we certify the same question certified inMajor v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

STONE, SHAHOOD, and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 20, 2002
807 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Doyle v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARY ANDREW DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 20, 2002

Citations

807 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)