From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 27, 2002
814 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-4989.

February 27, 2002.

Appeal form the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jack H. Cook, Judge.

Richard W. Springer of Richard W. Springer, P.A., Palm Springs, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the order summarily denying Appellant's motion for postconviction relief, seeking to vacate his conviction based on the alleged involuntariness of his plea. See Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As we did in Stretcher, we certify the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT IS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

FARMER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 27, 2002
814 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Doyle v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARY ANDREW DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 27, 2002

Citations

814 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)