From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyle v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 6, 2018
246 So. 3d 1298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18–1378

07-06-2018

Ryan DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Ryan Doyle, South Bay, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Ryan Doyle, South Bay, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court's denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We affirm as to Grounds One, Three, Four and Five. However, we reverse as to Ground Two because it was facially sufficient and the attached records do not conclusively refute Appellant's claim.

We remand for the postconviction court to reconsider Ground Two and either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach records conclusively refuting Appellant's claim set forth in Ground Two.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

TORPY, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doyle v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 6, 2018
246 So. 3d 1298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Doyle v. State

Case Details

Full title:RYAN DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 6, 2018

Citations

246 So. 3d 1298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)