Doyle v. Denver Dep't of Human Servs.

Full title: CELESTE DOYLE, Plaintiff, v. DENVER DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Civil Action No. 09-cv-03042-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-03042-WYD-KMT

11-29-2011

CELESTE DOYLE, Plaintiff, v. DENVER DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant.

Wiley Y. Daniel

Chief Judge

ORDER

THIS MATTER came before the Court on a Final Trial Preparation Conference on November 21, 2011. For the reasons stated on the record and at the hearing, it is

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine Re: Plaintiff's Testimony about Defense Counsel, Exhibit 66 and the Protective Order Issued by Magistrate Judge filed November 21, 2011 (ECF No. 118) is STRICKEN as untimely pursuant to Section III.C.1 of my Practice Standards. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine Re: Defense Counsel's Confidential Settlement Letter and Statements of Counsel to the EEOC filed November 21, 2011 (ECF No. 119) is STRICKEN as untimely pursuant to Section III.C.1 of my Practice Standards for failure to comply with Section of my Practice Standards. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine Re: Unemployment Benefits filed November 21, 2011 (ECF No. 120) is STRICKEN as untimely pursuant to Section III.C.1 of my Practice Standards. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer regarding jury instructions and a joint stipulated statement of the case as ordered on the record. The parties shall also met and confer regarding witnesses on Defendant's will call list and whether Plaintiff is required to subpoena these witnesses. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that on or before Wednesday, November 30, 2011, the parties will submit a joint stipulated statement of the case and a stipulated set of instructions (agreeing to the maximum extent possible to instructions) as well as a written document explaining the basis for objections to the disputed instructions as required by Section IV.A.4 of my Practice Standards. If the parties fail to comply, sanctions will be imposed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that on or before Wednesday, November 30, 2011, the parties will submit revised exhibit lists whereby the parties delete duplicative instructions and reach maximum agreement to authenticity and/or admissibility of the exhibits.

BY THE COURT:

Wiley Y. Daniel

Chief United States District Judge