From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doyen v. Cessna Aircraft Company

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Feb 7, 1983
425 So. 2d 786 (La. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-420.

December 22, 1982. Rehearing Denied February 7, 1983.

APPEAL FROM 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU; W. ELLIS BOND, JUDGE.

Cox, Cox Townsley, Rex D. Townsley, Lake Charles, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Raggio, Cappel, Chozen, Berniard, Christopher Trahan, Lake Charles, Oliver Schrumpf, Sulphur, for defendants-appellees.

Camp, Carmouche, Palmer, Barsh Hunter, David R. Frohn and Geralyn P. Garvey, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee-appellant.

Woodley, Barnett, Cox, Williams Fenet, J.L. Cox, Jr., Lake Charles, Tommy C. Rutledge, DeQuincy, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before DOMENGEAUX, FORET and LABORDE, JJ.


For the reasons stated in the companion case of Mrs. Bettye Gray Corley, In individually and as the Administratrix of the Successions of Guy Monroe Corley and Bryan Monroe Corley v. Gene Allen Air Service, Inc., and Oliver James Hunt, et al, 425 So.2d 781 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1982), it is Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that the summary judgment granted in favor of Gene Allen Air Services, Inc. and O.J. Hunt be and the same is hereby reversed.

It is further Ordered that this case be remanded back to the trial court for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

All costs on appeal are assessed against Gene Allen Air Services, Inc. and O.J. Hunt.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Doyen v. Cessna Aircraft Company

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Feb 7, 1983
425 So. 2d 786 (La. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Doyen v. Cessna Aircraft Company

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY MAE DOYEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 7, 1983

Citations

425 So. 2d 786 (La. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Corley v. Gene Allen Air Service, Inc.

Appellants argue that had such a device been on the airplane, that search crews might have spotted the craft…

Bonner v. United States Fire Ins. Co.

We agree that we did not mention in Jahrman that such a premium was charged, but we discern no difference in…