From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downs v. United States

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Feb 2, 2022
Criminal 1:19-cr-00028-MR-WCM-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2022)

Opinion

Criminal 1:19-cr-00028-MR-WCM-3 Civil 1:21-cv-00321-MR

02-02-2022

WILLIAM LUTHER DOWNS, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

Martin Reidmger, Chief United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.

The pro se Petitioner has filed a Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [Doc. 1]. The Government has filed a Response opposing § 2255 relief. [Doc. 3]. The Petitioner may file a reply to the Response, if he chooses to do so, within fourteen (14) days of this Order.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that no later than fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order, the Petitioner may file a reply to the Government's Response in opposition to his § 2255 Motion to Vacate.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Downs v. United States

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Feb 2, 2022
Criminal 1:19-cr-00028-MR-WCM-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Downs v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM LUTHER DOWNS, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

Date published: Feb 2, 2022

Citations

Criminal 1:19-cr-00028-MR-WCM-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2022)