From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downing v. Rockland County Corr. Facility

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 24, 2011
11 Civ. 2934 (LBS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

11 Civ. 2934 (LBS).

October 24, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


By Order dated June 13, 2011, Plaintiff was directed to file an Amended Complaint with the Court within sixty (60) days. On July 12, 2011, Plaintiff was granted a sixty-day extension to comply with the Court's June 13, 2011 Order. Since Plaintiff has failed to submit an Amended Complaint as specified, it is,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That the Complaint, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Court's Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Downing v. Rockland County Corr. Facility

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 24, 2011
11 Civ. 2934 (LBS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Downing v. Rockland County Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT EDWARD DOWNING, Plaintiff, v. ROCKLAND COUNTY CORR. FACILITY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

11 Civ. 2934 (LBS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2011)