From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downing v. Pondugula

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 14, 2022
4:21-cv-1006-P-BJ (N.D. Tex. Apr. 14, 2022)

Opinion

4:21-cv-1006-P-BJ

04-14-2022

Jane' Downing, Plaintiff, v. Kishore Pondugula et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Mark T. Pittman United States District Judge

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case. ECF No. 32. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b) (ECF No. 15) should be, and is hereby, DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Downing v. Pondugula

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 14, 2022
4:21-cv-1006-P-BJ (N.D. Tex. Apr. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Downing v. Pondugula

Case Details

Full title:Jane' Downing, Plaintiff, v. Kishore Pondugula et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

4:21-cv-1006-P-BJ (N.D. Tex. Apr. 14, 2022)

Citing Cases

Stennis v. The Moorings of Oak Harbor Prop. Owners' Ass'n

In the Fifth Circuit, § 3617 claims “require an underlying violation of §§ 3603, 3604, 3605, or 3606.”…