From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downing v. Khan

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 26, 2023
2:23-cv-00082-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00082-ART-NJK

07-26-2023

JOSEPH DOWNING, Plaintiff, v. DR. KAHN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

[DOCKET NOS. 17, 18]

Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs motions for subpoena. Docket Nos. 17, 18. Plaintiff asks the Coiul to issue subpoenas for various video and documentary evidence from High Desert State Prison, Docket No. 17, and Clark County Detention Center, Docket No. 18. No defendant has answered or otherwise appeared in this case and the Court has yet to enter a scheduling order. See Docket. Plaintiffs motions are, therefore, premature. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26; Local Rule 26-1. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motions for subpoenas are DENIED without prejudice. Docket Nos. 17, 18.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Downing v. Khan

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 26, 2023
2:23-cv-00082-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Downing v. Khan

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH DOWNING, Plaintiff, v. DR. KAHN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 26, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00082-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 26, 2023)