For these reasons, the Court finds the disclosure form here to be even less "reasonably understandable" than the disclosure form in Gilberg . See also,Downing v. Haven Health Grp. LLC, 2019 WL 330897, at *4 (D. Ariz. Jan. 25, 2019) (holding that plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a violation of the clear and conspicuous requirement because "[p]laintiff alleges that [d]efendant larded too much extraneous information into its FCRA disclosure forms, that he was confused by this extra information, and that he wouldn't have signed the forms if he'd understood what he was doing."). By contrast, the disclosure form here is conspicuous.